Skip to main content

Questions!

                Is this a product of envy that I am not enjoying what they are enjoying? Have I been envious seeing foreign exchange students wherein the people I know are enjoying their chances staying abroad and learning from the outside? Yes, I am feeling a little bit down that I am not experiencing what they are privileged at.  I am having one of those healthy sessions of being envy as to motivate myself.

                People are studying abroad, for what? Another good additive to their brand so as to have authority over those who did not have any? It is because there is the avenue of great minds? Why can we not make our home great by our own sustenance as how they did? Typically, we still do not have a niche on our own. We are even alien at our own language and so am I in writing this one. Yes, if they are great by their own right, therefore we can be also the problem is we over patronize what is not ours.

                People are travelling? Has travelling gone cheap? Or do I belong to the underpaid “professionals” who barely survives in his salary? Or are my priorities first to establish my own reputation to increase my credentials and salary? So that I can purchase myself a decent lot and house for my own? Have I been burdening myself with survival first before actualizing the artistic side of travel and expansion of horizon?

                Have I been left out in philosophy? I am not contented with my exam results, and I am myself to blame. Where am I now in my trade? I use to have glorious pedestals, but they were the what were once, nothing recent actually. My friends are in groups and here I am alone and studying by myself.

                In my being as a teacher, have I really passed knowledge? Or no! Not just passed, but transmitted the attitude of thinking? Where does that lead them to? Our system sees no importance of thinkers. Not even an individual will have the leisure of speculation. What am I teaching then? Just for the sake of thinking beautiful thoughts? And for what? They will be doctors, engineers and experts in their won fields someday, I will be left as just a part in their TOR and I will be forgotten.

                Have I contributed something to society? Have I paid back with my quality service as being a filter and a breeding instrument in the educational system? What have I done other than just merely survive?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fin?

  Last 2012, there were hearts on fire that both had their first shared flame in an unlikely place. I was thirsty for love coming from being dormant while she was searching for a redemption from a series of broken hearts. Both struggled to find their place. Both trying to live their lives free from the hideous chains of a dark home. I must admit that I fell for her beauty and add to that, her care. As we both clasped our hands, it was a committed long shot to have the perfect rest for our hearts. It was a bit strange to have an affair under the noses of all that is forbidden both profession and a line of faith. Nothing was wrong as long both were in the ecstasy of love – no malice, no foul play, no trespassing of wills. That moment was a perfect episode in a romantic film – one where young love sprang amidst treacherous circumstances. We lived through the happiness of newfound belongingness and the battle of keeping that alive. 4 years before the wedlock were filled with ups an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Article Review on Elinita Garcia's "Gabriel Marcel: Primary and Secondary Reflection"

Summary:             Gabriel Marcel is a known French existentialist. His co-Frenchman, Jean-Paul Sartre, distinguished existentialism into two which were coined as  atheistic  and  theistic  (Christian) wherein Sartre did mention Marcel as part of the latter in lecture on Existentialism a Humanism . Marcel is a Christian existentialist because he included the divine even amidst the infamous perception of existentialism as godless. Moreover, he is also known for his non-systematic philosophy where he pointed out that the philosophical discipline starts from where one is (referring to the particularity of the situation); therefore, it is not from metaphysical assumptions or already laid down theories.             Marcel’s thoughts talk about the importance and the necessity of reflection wherein he divides it into two as a) primary reflectio...
Post a Comment
Read more

LAND ETHICS

ON ALDO LEOPOLD’S LAND ETHIC                Most of the ethical theories deal with principles concerning rightness or wrongness that govern human interaction with other humans. Less has been the case for how humans should interact with the environment. Thus, Aldo Leopold puts forward land ethics as a layout for humanity’s relationship with the land.                Inasmuch as establishing principles of interaction between humans and the environment, it is a hard task to do since there is a need to reframe a dominating instrumentalist perspective that humans have i.e., objects are in use and should be used to achieve happiness. Part of the disposables to cater human happiness is the environment of which humans still see as a property (for consumption) rather than a coequal such as how ethical theories have always looked at humans with each other ...
Post a Comment
Read more