Skip to main content

This One Goes Out to the One's Who Love

                We know that falling and being in love is one of the greatest feelings to someone who have ever existed. All the more especially when we are the object of such devotion. But I think there is a difference from a person who begins to love because he or she is lonely than a person who loves because he or she really do love. For one, to the one who felt loneliness, there is the need to love for a unconscious demand of being loved in return and that is why one tends to love to catch someone’s attention so as to be reciprocated and thus the loneliness be dispelled. But to one who simply loves without conditions brought upon neither by the other nor from one’s own circumstance, then that is truly something sincere.

                As a popular saying goes that you cannot love others without loving yourself first is indeed true. For to those who never found solitude in themselves even in times of being alone, then one is weak in handling one’s self and especially if one seeks companions just for a temporary delusion and dispelling of being alone. If one cannot love one’s self in one’s own loneliness then that definitely poses a problem of merely usurping the object of love as a cure to the drought of loneliness.

                It is hard if one’s cup is empty and one starts to give emptiness, because there is nothing really given. It is hard also if one does not know how to fill one’s own cup if one waits for the other to fill in for them and the abuse of that will lead to usurpation and that is something dangerous. Sometimes we ask ourselves why our relationship failed. Was it because someone was utterly giving it all and the other was simply receiving and upon that other’s frailty the other was pushed to the limit in giving all one could until that someone became drained and stressed? I guarantee you, that even to the self-sufficient ones who have a sincere heart to the frail, when the other simply does not know how to stand on one’s own for long, then eventually the stress comes of having false hopes of being a martyr.

                One could never be a God in love in permanence, but one could be in meantime. But to demand the God out of the other is simply too idealistic and too much of a wish for the other is just as limited as you are. Remember that we still are humans and the one who gambles his heart on you in all out devotion seeks also a kind return to mutually fill what was lost so that both can just mutual reciprocate but if one is merely receiving and spilling out the abundance of the gifts, then eventually the limited source will run dry and it may take awhile to rejuvenate lost spirit.


                One works out to be independent enough and self-sufficient enough to work as a productive and effective partner in times of the other’s crisis and enough strength to temporarily carry at hand the other while yet recovering from lost spirit. But if one is not independent enough, then that poses a problem because the other cannot enjoy the aid of being helped and carried upon when one is at one’s crisis. Therefore, it should be a guarantee that one is an individual enough to carry along the joys and trials of having a relationship, because there is WE and not simply and I in a tandem. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Article Review on Elinita Garcia's "Gabriel Marcel: Primary and Secondary Reflection"

Summary:             Gabriel Marcel is a known French existentialist. His co-Frenchman, Jean-Paul Sartre, distinguished existentialism into two which were coined as  atheistic  and  theistic  (Christian) wherein Sartre did mention Marcel as part of the latter in lecture on Existentialism a Humanism . Marcel is a Christian existentialist because he included the divine even amidst the infamous perception of existentialism as godless. Moreover, he is also known for his non-systematic philosophy where he pointed out that the philosophical discipline starts from where one is (referring to the particularity of the situation); therefore, it is not from metaphysical assumptions or already laid down theories.             Marcel’s thoughts talk about the importance and the necessity of reflection wherein he divides it into two as a) primary reflection and b) secondary reflection. Reflection for Marcel is “nothing other than attention, i.e. directed towards this sort of small break

Fin?

  Last 2012, there were hearts on fire that both had their first shared flame in an unlikely place. I was thirsty for love coming from being dormant while she was searching for a redemption from a series of broken hearts. Both struggled to find their place. Both trying to live their lives free from the hideous chains of a dark home. I must admit that I fell for her beauty and add to that, her care. As we both clasped our hands, it was a committed long shot to have the perfect rest for our hearts. It was a bit strange to have an affair under the noses of all that is forbidden both profession and a line of faith. Nothing was wrong as long both were in the ecstasy of love – no malice, no foul play, no trespassing of wills. That moment was a perfect episode in a romantic film – one where young love sprang amidst treacherous circumstances. We lived through the happiness of newfound belongingness and the battle of keeping that alive. 4 years before the wedlock were filled with ups and do

Bertrand Russell and the Sense of Sin

Introduction             Ethics is this study of what is good and what is bad and throughout the course of history it had also its shares of disputes and animosities. But beneath all of it is that ethics is a means in order to arrive at happiness or the good life. Because we have to act correspondingly or in a certain manner wherein we can get to attain harmony within ourselves especially regarding to our conscience or in harmony with others in order to keep relationships or ultimately to preserve one’s self or to attain such security whether externally and that is in relation with others or internally or personal satisfaction. Our actions are guided by principles of which we take actions correspondingly but the question lies what then are these principles and sometimes we go back to our way of understanding or our metaphysical assumptions wherein we garner from these in order to make way into how we conduct ourselves in our actions. In this paper then, I will explicate Bertrand