Skip to main content

The Horizon

      I have been relieved from my duties of being a teacher due to the conflict of culture. I am guilty of not following the syllabus but I redefined it to give students a breather from the mechanized structure of the educational system. I am guilty of cursing inside the classroom and I am proud of it, since I curse when I needed to and to give emphasis. I am guilty that I discussed sex in class, but that I am legitimizing it through Freud, Russell and Alain de Botton. Why do I discuss these in the Humanities? Is it not because it is one way to liberate students from thought control? Thought control from conservatism and tradition? I applied Nietzsche and some of the critical thinkers inside the classroom. I even imbue that kind of philosophical trend through my art. I had very negative feedbacks about that, but in equal I have positive feedbacks to those who understood me. Yes, I failed in the rubrics of the administration and even caught their attention through student’s personalized comments, but nonetheless I am successful of being truthful to my heart and to the creed of liberalism and the propagation of new culture inside the school. In fact, those anti-normative persons are those special figures in history, being hated and contested in their time of existence (although there is too support from his circle), but at the moment of death he is then elevated to a god-like status of being a genius. But then again, it is his consolation to see himself glorified from beneath the grave. But while he yet lives, he is plainly misunderstood and this is what Ralph Waldo Emerson would say, “to be great is to be misunderstood”.

       Have I been the propagator of enlightenment? Wherein I am but a voice in the wilderness crying out aloud to awaken people in their dogmatic slumber set by the claws of tradition? Yes, although the school gave me a two year chance to propagate these anarchistic yet beautiful thoughts but they never saw the beauty in my resistance, or in the revolution and that I say they manufacture their students to being mindless civilians in the future. Yes, they would try to argue in the form of making my trend the trend, well I would say, “so be it”, let us just see when that becomes the norm then what norm are we to derive out from the current situation so that we can transcend and re-evaluate norms so that society will not be static but all the more dynamic, active and every growing. Yet, I understand their dogmatism and conservatism, but two years was one good project for me to shower this liberalism to my students wherein I could ever hope that my name remains an echo, a spectre that haunts the walls of the school. But not as a cry of vengeance but as the cry of the students who are hungry for freedom and a new world.

       Have I opened the floodgates to the critical world? They may criticize that all of these will lead to anarchy, but isn’t that what is the most glorious of all epitomic events in history that we love to discuss in our rooms? Let the students create history, not the administration who but furnishes them into pieces of cogs for the industrial set-up. But how can they create history when there is no leader to bring them those thoughts? And that was my purpose in teaching, and that is my mission.


       So sad to know that I am leaving the school but there is one great treasure that I have garnered from that institution and that is my ever loving Johannah Joy Batiancila. The very lotus flower in the murky waters. Amidst that institution I made a whole lot of friends and students who are willing to embrace a new culture of standard and dignity for the Philippines. Yes, I lost the contract, but the seed has been planted to those hearts whom the message of emancipation has been touched. We will see a new world, free from control, those who does not only live in the system, but can be critical inside of it, and to those who can re-evaluate the system by destroying what is needed to be destroyed in order to build a new. The school will never be forgotten because I am with my Joy because of that, and I did plant a seed to some concerned students. Evangelization at its finest and finding love within that mission.

Comments

  1. my friend once told me that he is not mad at the world. He just don't like the system we're living and following.
    well, we are part of that system, and we must admit that some people misunderstood our deeds and came into a decision with no proper basis and without even realizing what good you've brought to your students' mind as well as to our society..

    hahah! heck! you might not get my point kay nonsense kaayu ko(hahaha). anyway, i just wanna say that, that is life... and life must GUZON no matter what...."

    (sayang, i hadn't get the chance nga ma'under nmu when i was still in ACT.)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Article Review on Elinita Garcia's "Gabriel Marcel: Primary and Secondary Reflection"

Summary:             Gabriel Marcel is a known French existentialist. His co-Frenchman, Jean-Paul Sartre, distinguished existentialism into two which were coined as  atheistic  and  theistic  (Christian) wherein Sartre did mention Marcel as part of the latter in lecture on Existentialism a Humanism . Marcel is a Christian existentialist because he included the divine even amidst the infamous perception of existentialism as godless. Moreover, he is also known for his non-systematic philosophy where he pointed out that the philosophical discipline starts from where one is (referring to the particularity of the situation); therefore, it is not from metaphysical assumptions or already laid down theories.             Marcel’s thoughts talk about the importance and the necessity of reflection wherein he divides it into two as a) primary reflection and b) secondary reflection. Reflection for Marcel is “nothing other than attention, i.e. directed towards this sort of small break

Fin?

  Last 2012, there were hearts on fire that both had their first shared flame in an unlikely place. I was thirsty for love coming from being dormant while she was searching for a redemption from a series of broken hearts. Both struggled to find their place. Both trying to live their lives free from the hideous chains of a dark home. I must admit that I fell for her beauty and add to that, her care. As we both clasped our hands, it was a committed long shot to have the perfect rest for our hearts. It was a bit strange to have an affair under the noses of all that is forbidden both profession and a line of faith. Nothing was wrong as long both were in the ecstasy of love – no malice, no foul play, no trespassing of wills. That moment was a perfect episode in a romantic film – one where young love sprang amidst treacherous circumstances. We lived through the happiness of newfound belongingness and the battle of keeping that alive. 4 years before the wedlock were filled with ups and do

Bertrand Russell and the Sense of Sin

Introduction             Ethics is this study of what is good and what is bad and throughout the course of history it had also its shares of disputes and animosities. But beneath all of it is that ethics is a means in order to arrive at happiness or the good life. Because we have to act correspondingly or in a certain manner wherein we can get to attain harmony within ourselves especially regarding to our conscience or in harmony with others in order to keep relationships or ultimately to preserve one’s self or to attain such security whether externally and that is in relation with others or internally or personal satisfaction. Our actions are guided by principles of which we take actions correspondingly but the question lies what then are these principles and sometimes we go back to our way of understanding or our metaphysical assumptions wherein we garner from these in order to make way into how we conduct ourselves in our actions. In this paper then, I will explicate Bertrand