Skip to main content

Useless Teacher


              I have been reflecting amidst my isolation from the teaching profession, and I have nothing but meager social media posts and quick conversations that can help me assess my profession’s impact. As much as I poured my heart out to the call, much of the people I came across after their meager time with me in the classroom was more of heartache rather than reaping fruits. Thus, for them, their time with me was just a passing phase in their privileged or desperate academic life. Designing minds cannot be done in a classroom because the school is just a fraction of a student’s time. A student imitates and learns more from the environment he or she is exposed to. Whether it be at home, community, or the virtual, to where they spend most of their time influences them a lot. Moreover, schools, which are synonymous to education, are but a requirement to have a job. And only a rare few can see the value of its enlightening potential.

              Home is the first truth for the child. From religion to etiquette, the home nurtures the child’s wellbeing. And since most families are scourged by poverty, to them, getting enlightened is less of a concern because bringing food on the table is the major issue. I cannot blame them because what is thinking when you have an empty stomach? That is why a thought epiphany for the hungry is never the same as how philosophers get into touch with the sublime. All they can realize is trying to find ways to climb up the ladder of inequality. That is why studying for the child is a matter of getting barely the passing grade because it is all what is needed in accelerating towards the minimum job qualification. And if the teacher’s or school’s standards are strictly imposed, you have parents begging for mercy, or you have the nightmarish reasoning of students being a reflection of their teacher. You have the marginalized caught in the desire to simply finish school, have a grade, and become part of the wage earners. Again, since their pragmatics is limited to having food on the table, then you cannot blame them for not going further to think. And that was my challenge in facing these kinds of students. I did beg the questions: "What is philosophy for them? How can I bring them to thinking?"

              Another disparity of the youth are those who are privileged enough to not care. To them, school is nothing more again as a passing phase, not as a key to a job, but as compliance with either societal or familial expectations. These students can see poverty but have a hard time empathizing because of the absence of direct experience. The only hunger they felt is skipping a meal and not the hunger of not having one plus the worry of not having another tomorrow. These are the students whose concept of hard work that brings success cannot see the inequality behind the elitist value, as most of them are brought up with parents who saw their families economic miracle as a fruit of their actual labor minus the privilege. They are too privileged that they cannot see that the opportunity they have was far better compared to a lowly farmer at the countryside. These are hard stones to crack because they are basking of the “success” their home claimed to have.

              One cannot deny the influence of one’s abode in their upbringing; and as long as the perception of schools and education are seen as tickets to economic liberation in an unequal society, thinking, thoughts, and critiques are the least concern. But why take prime on the enlightening aspects? Many great people have already seen the necessity of education for bringing change in society, and change is not limited to an increment in GDP but also on the quality of the civilian life. However, this idea of education in my country is nothing but a romantic slogan. A slogan that any teacher and student can say but cannot see its practical relevance. Thus, let us try building a revolutionary culture at every house, as I have even come to the conclusion that the home must be the primal target. Increasing the overall standard of living paired with a strong thinking culture must be enjoyed by every family.  From the television shows that they need to watch to local community activities, all must engender a culture that every idealist-teacher is yearning for inside his or her classroom. What is the use when classroom lessons are but echoes for memorization because the home is never near the noblest of thoughts for their furtherance? Sometimes, parents themselves are the first authoritarians who failed to imbibe a culture of openness. They just pass down the tyranny they experienced to their children; and thus, you have a sheep for a populace. Plus, we all know that the dominant shepherds are wolves. When a child starts to ask sensible questions, the default parent’s reaction is to see it as a threat to authority rather than both a teaching and learning moment for themselves. They too are absent of truth, and in that lack, they fear their children will lose sight of them as power figures. Worse, parents see their children as a ladder to the economic liberation that they too are yearning. I can say poverty did mar even the depth of the parent to child relationship and substitute it as a necessity for survival. Moreover, being impoverished does not only concern economic poverty but also with thinking and culture. The cancer is well deep within most homes and being born within that community is having a high chance of getting contaminated. And you as a teacher, how can you remove deeply-rooted cancer? How can you remove a tumor that even refuses to be removed?

              At the end of the day, from my direct experience to what I heard, saw, and studied, an idealistic teacher shares the useless fate of Sisyphus engrossed with his or her labor only to see it roll down the hill. Much worse, even schools themselves are infected with the diseases in which the fanning of the flames is amplified by the bigger societal powers such as the government and business sectors. I just got to ask, what is my labor worth? Is this a useless passion? The fight continues. . .
             

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Article Review on Elinita Garcia's "Gabriel Marcel: Primary and Secondary Reflection"

Summary:             Gabriel Marcel is a known French existentialist. His co-Frenchman, Jean-Paul Sartre, distinguished existentialism into two which were coined as  atheistic  and  theistic  (Christian) wherein Sartre did mention Marcel as part of the latter in lecture on Existentialism a Humanism . Marcel is a Christian existentialist because he included the divine even amidst the infamous perception of existentialism as godless. Moreover, he is also known for his non-systematic philosophy where he pointed out that the philosophical discipline starts from where one is (referring to the particularity of the situation); therefore, it is not from metaphysical assumptions or already laid down theories.             Marcel’s thoughts talk about the importance and the necessity of reflection wherein he divides it into two as a) primary reflection and b) secondary reflection. Reflection for Marcel is “nothing other than attention, i.e. directed towards this sort of small break

Fin?

  Last 2012, there were hearts on fire that both had their first shared flame in an unlikely place. I was thirsty for love coming from being dormant while she was searching for a redemption from a series of broken hearts. Both struggled to find their place. Both trying to live their lives free from the hideous chains of a dark home. I must admit that I fell for her beauty and add to that, her care. As we both clasped our hands, it was a committed long shot to have the perfect rest for our hearts. It was a bit strange to have an affair under the noses of all that is forbidden both profession and a line of faith. Nothing was wrong as long both were in the ecstasy of love – no malice, no foul play, no trespassing of wills. That moment was a perfect episode in a romantic film – one where young love sprang amidst treacherous circumstances. We lived through the happiness of newfound belongingness and the battle of keeping that alive. 4 years before the wedlock were filled with ups and do

Bertrand Russell and the Sense of Sin

Introduction             Ethics is this study of what is good and what is bad and throughout the course of history it had also its shares of disputes and animosities. But beneath all of it is that ethics is a means in order to arrive at happiness or the good life. Because we have to act correspondingly or in a certain manner wherein we can get to attain harmony within ourselves especially regarding to our conscience or in harmony with others in order to keep relationships or ultimately to preserve one’s self or to attain such security whether externally and that is in relation with others or internally or personal satisfaction. Our actions are guided by principles of which we take actions correspondingly but the question lies what then are these principles and sometimes we go back to our way of understanding or our metaphysical assumptions wherein we garner from these in order to make way into how we conduct ourselves in our actions. In this paper then, I will explicate Bertrand