Skip to main content

Teaching Machine


Since when was the last time that I opened a book or a pdf file out of free choice to read? Even if I were to read what I want to read, but the wanting was more of coercion of circumstances rather than that volition to actually read. It has all too become forced, routine and a false but practical association to survival. I have become a knowledge processor and just like a machine I need the appropriate inputs in order for me dispense necessary outputs. Consider me a pedagogical machine. Teaching has been one of the jobs that demands to bring home the job itself. I sometimes envy my wife for not bringing any of her job at home. But mine, before I sleep at night and or when I arrive at home I am always thinking of what I am to do tomorrow and what I am to read and what are plans in order to make tomorrow happen. I love the job, but as time went by, it became all too draining as it saps the very luxury there is to reading. Reading and or studying has become a means for survival and here I am alienated from the very passion of reading and studying because of the routine. Even the same pressure existed way back in my college days, but at that time I read not just because I wanted to pass but I find those things interesting without the pressure of having to earn a living out from it. I can say reading and studying is a bourgeoisie activity because the fulfilment of it is in the realm of leisure. And in college, I can also read other things because I had all the time. But now, I am locked into this academic machinery. Although, I find joy in whatever happens in the classroom. To what the students learn, engage and get astonished about, but for me, I need the awe and wonder there is when I am to open a book. The wonder was stripped away and was replaced by the need to earn. All the more, the compounding stress exists thinking about the possibility that students just simply need to satisfy me, what I need to hear or just play along in the name’s sake of passing the subject of which I do not like because when I chose to go to college, I was very hungry of what I can encounter and I did not do things in order to pass subjects, I did those tasks because it sparked curiosity in my part and along the way the unintended result of passing was there.

I have become a teaching machine. With all the books that I have both in paper and virtual copies, I still have to open them all according to my delight. It is a different feel when we get to read and study when we are internally giddy and ready about reading. Knowing and thinking becomes meaningful and satisfying. Although external factors can contribute to one’s reading, but I am that person who reads out of curiosity. Out of the need to grasp something that I want. But again, here I am, a teaching machine. I wonder how long I can still trump this dread with the illusory reasons of service through education?  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Article Review on Elinita Garcia's "Gabriel Marcel: Primary and Secondary Reflection"

Summary:             Gabriel Marcel is a known French existentialist. His co-Frenchman, Jean-Paul Sartre, distinguished existentialism into two which were coined as  atheistic  and  theistic  (Christian) wherein Sartre did mention Marcel as part of the latter in lecture on Existentialism a Humanism . Marcel is a Christian existentialist because he included the divine even amidst the infamous perception of existentialism as godless. Moreover, he is also known for his non-systematic philosophy where he pointed out that the philosophical discipline starts from where one is (referring to the particularity of the situation); therefore, it is not from metaphysical assumptions or already laid down theories.             Marcel’s thoughts talk about the importance and the necessity of reflection wherein he divides it into two as a) primary reflection and b) secondary reflection. Reflection for Marcel is “nothing other than attention, i.e. directed towards this sort of small break

Fin?

  Last 2012, there were hearts on fire that both had their first shared flame in an unlikely place. I was thirsty for love coming from being dormant while she was searching for a redemption from a series of broken hearts. Both struggled to find their place. Both trying to live their lives free from the hideous chains of a dark home. I must admit that I fell for her beauty and add to that, her care. As we both clasped our hands, it was a committed long shot to have the perfect rest for our hearts. It was a bit strange to have an affair under the noses of all that is forbidden both profession and a line of faith. Nothing was wrong as long both were in the ecstasy of love – no malice, no foul play, no trespassing of wills. That moment was a perfect episode in a romantic film – one where young love sprang amidst treacherous circumstances. We lived through the happiness of newfound belongingness and the battle of keeping that alive. 4 years before the wedlock were filled with ups and do

Bertrand Russell and the Sense of Sin

Introduction             Ethics is this study of what is good and what is bad and throughout the course of history it had also its shares of disputes and animosities. But beneath all of it is that ethics is a means in order to arrive at happiness or the good life. Because we have to act correspondingly or in a certain manner wherein we can get to attain harmony within ourselves especially regarding to our conscience or in harmony with others in order to keep relationships or ultimately to preserve one’s self or to attain such security whether externally and that is in relation with others or internally or personal satisfaction. Our actions are guided by principles of which we take actions correspondingly but the question lies what then are these principles and sometimes we go back to our way of understanding or our metaphysical assumptions wherein we garner from these in order to make way into how we conduct ourselves in our actions. In this paper then, I will explicate Bertrand