Skip to main content

Tyranny in the Academe

            If there is one tyranny that I would gladly surrender myself and that is the tyranny of reason. However, the world I am immersed into is a tyranny of the old, the titled and so called professed. The academe is indeed a bastion of excellence, a spawning pool for potential great people, but the breeders are themselves hog washed by the illusion of being immutable and infallible. When title, position and a touch of “self-proclaimed-hoodness” are the primary elements that reinforce their bearing in the environment then what we have is failure of democracy. We, the “have-nots”, too have that self-proclaim-hoodness; however, it is title and position that we do not have and we know the world functions in a hierarchy and at times that hierarchy is founded on power play and not on reason.

            As a lover of wisdom, I reject power as truth but let truth be power and that I have no qualms about. The institution is plagued with titles who never were in the first place commensurate of its worth since, it is a well-known likelihood and suspicion that diplomas and degrees have monetary equivalence with a touch of no-sweat-just-comply nature of acquisition. We are defeated if not, lagged behind in the game of tenureship as we garner for that title which is of worth and therefore, arduous, painful yet authentic. Rushed documents are indeed humiliating yet they do not know that it is for it is just the paper that matters. However, confronting these papered giants is a hard task when it comes to legitimacy of one’s “opinion” because by default, who are we, the young, the unskilled, the untitled and no position dare question or if in a friendly manner, dare initiate a healthy conversation?

            I am blessed to have a good environment that reared me to a point of being radical. Radical and qualified. Yet, no one hears the young. If not the young, in my case, the aloof. Alone and petrified with all of my books in the shelf, not for display, but truly touched. Alone in my art as lame pop truly sucks. Alone in the pack of normies and non-radicals. Alone in that 'room', but not with the recipients of how I do my tutelage. However, they who have seen the radical worth of my visions and how I embody to them my upbringing and the upbringing of legends found me noteworthy. How I embody the disciplines that made the young and the radicals possible and actual in them. How I excite their heads to the point of knowledge thirst. Although this may sound egotistical and plain narcissistic, but let the true “them” be the judge not my superiors. Because, it is again how I serve the people that I found my worth, not my bosses. But if my boss be a person for the people then we are one in principle. To serve my people, to serve the truth is my suspicious altruistic end and I say such for that is how egoistic I am for there is this eternal 'recognition' of my being through the students and the people. Anyone who is capable of rousing the majority is always targeted for execution by the system holders. They who have titles, whether authentic or not are afraid to lose their lordship over the dictates of the qualified masses. The inauthentic "they" are the ones who will crucify the source of dissent - a dissent which leads to a reevaluation of systems. The head of the revolution is to be blamed, but actually he or she is just the embodiment of the suppressed will of the many. He or she is just a symbol and the manifestation of the awakening of the consciousness of the many.


            I cannot awe them with the books and experiences I have and continue to accumulate because I am young. Just because I am young, I have no say. But underneath your self-proclaimhoodness, we are building an empire. We are slowly rising. To the co and superiors, time will come and we will rise. My worth is not your approval but their's! "What we do in life, echoes in eternity!" It is to what I do that counts, not what I have.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Article Review on Elinita Garcia's "Gabriel Marcel: Primary and Secondary Reflection"

Summary:             Gabriel Marcel is a known French existentialist. His co-Frenchman, Jean-Paul Sartre, distinguished existentialism into two which were coined as  atheistic  and  theistic  (Christian) wherein Sartre did mention Marcel as part of the latter in lecture on Existentialism a Humanism . Marcel is a Christian existentialist because he included the divine even amidst the infamous perception of existentialism as godless. Moreover, he is also known for his non-systematic philosophy where he pointed out that the philosophical discipline starts from where one is (referring to the particularity of the situation); therefore, it is not from metaphysical assumptions or already laid down theories.             Marcel’s thoughts talk about the importance and the necessity of reflection wherein he divides it into two as a) primary reflection and b) secondary reflection. Reflection for Marcel is “nothing other than attention, i.e. directed towards this sort of small break

Fin?

  Last 2012, there were hearts on fire that both had their first shared flame in an unlikely place. I was thirsty for love coming from being dormant while she was searching for a redemption from a series of broken hearts. Both struggled to find their place. Both trying to live their lives free from the hideous chains of a dark home. I must admit that I fell for her beauty and add to that, her care. As we both clasped our hands, it was a committed long shot to have the perfect rest for our hearts. It was a bit strange to have an affair under the noses of all that is forbidden both profession and a line of faith. Nothing was wrong as long both were in the ecstasy of love – no malice, no foul play, no trespassing of wills. That moment was a perfect episode in a romantic film – one where young love sprang amidst treacherous circumstances. We lived through the happiness of newfound belongingness and the battle of keeping that alive. 4 years before the wedlock were filled with ups and do

Bertrand Russell and the Sense of Sin

Introduction             Ethics is this study of what is good and what is bad and throughout the course of history it had also its shares of disputes and animosities. But beneath all of it is that ethics is a means in order to arrive at happiness or the good life. Because we have to act correspondingly or in a certain manner wherein we can get to attain harmony within ourselves especially regarding to our conscience or in harmony with others in order to keep relationships or ultimately to preserve one’s self or to attain such security whether externally and that is in relation with others or internally or personal satisfaction. Our actions are guided by principles of which we take actions correspondingly but the question lies what then are these principles and sometimes we go back to our way of understanding or our metaphysical assumptions wherein we garner from these in order to make way into how we conduct ourselves in our actions. In this paper then, I will explicate Bertrand