The youth is the future of our nation which in fact is a pale
blue dot in a pale blue dot. Indeed, it is a fact because they will replace the
old ones after they are nurtured for the real world. Yes, they are the future
because they are the potential working force that will raise the status of the
economy. Moreover, we can export them to the global community to work for
transnational corporations and much so there are those who still wish to strive
inside our nation. If the future solely means having a stable job and then
contributing to the national budget then the future is indeed promising.
The means in
preparing this youth through education is one way to rear them for a future. Education
serves as that requisite wherein they are fully trained for the world. However,
mostly of the educational institutions here in the Philippines are problematic.
To some extent, there is indeed a monopolistic hold of quality among the
private schools wherein most of the public basic education can barely compete. Even
though that there is a huge salary grade difference between public and private
sectors, but indeed there is a good influx of teachers who chose to teach in
the private sectors regardless of the obvious salary grade. Or is it because there
is still the popular notion of the status and prestige you have upon working in
a private school? Or just an escape from the problematic government run
schools?
Although
both learning environments did manage curriculum wise to impart as much as
possible the necessary skills for the future labor force, but the aim in this
presentation is not to show from what sector holds the very skilful and or
technically superior graduates. There is indeed the existing disparity between
the two, but here, I find that that is not the thrust I am considering. In the
growing demand for graduates who will serve as cogs in the machinery, they have
been trained to be so specialized and highly single minded or linear to their
field and then tying it up to make it soon as their means for survival. Even
though that indeed it brought them the happy life, but only as individuals and
to those who are biologically approximate with them. They have forgotten that
we live in a society and that we have a responsibility not for ourselves alone,
but also to the others to whom we are immersed with.
The
education sector is indeed focused into more of the rearing of the youth for a
future career, but never into an active participant in society in terms of
politics and social modifications such as contribution to policy makings and
reconstructions or amendments laws. These students are immersed in a learning
environment for so long a time in which this kind of politicization or
“activization” is not even embedded into them, maybe because of the
environment’s neutral nature or a cleverly made strategy to numb the human
resource and reduce them to mere cogs in the machinery, just parts and
therefore lifeless. Lifeless and then only gives an only economic contribution
by just expanding the profit machinery of the enterprises.
Inasmuch as
critical thinking is concerned, much of it is only aimed for academic purposes
and less is used to understand society at large. More so, stories inside the
classroom are so irrelevant to the social structures present that are really in
need of attention. Or, maybe there was no effort to integrate as much as
possible a kind of critical consciousness to any subject through any hypothetical
or real situations that can be presented thereof. Math problems like apples and
oranges are not designed to at least stimulate awareness of the socio-political
sphere one is in at. Even the tortuous stigma of falling asleep is ever present
in a history or social studies class and indeed it has ever growingly made a
long lasting effect to the students to consequentially dub this class as boring
and dragging. The consequence thereof is apathy to these subjects resulting to
a trivial understanding of the past or far worse, no understanding at all. It
has always been the sickness of the present to forget the past and that is why
history repeats itself, as Hegel said “What we learned in history is that we
never learned from it, that is why it repeats itself.”
The stories
of the revolution and of the class struggles were dimly emphasized and sickly
made trivial. “History is a history of class struggle” as Marx would put it and
the struggle is left to rot in the memory banks of the students with no clear
understanding and even praxis; then the story of the revolution is nothing more
than a relic, a term that will be tantamount to one point in an enumeration
examination. Moreover, by the end of the class, the songs of the heroes, sung
and unsung remain just an event of the past with no inspiring impetus to use
for the present. Furthermore, the awareness of the students are not even
stimulated to be conscious of the present conditions of which is akin to that
of history in which the solution which gave a beautiful dialectic is the event
of the revolution. Local and world history felt the drastic change and the call
to progress through revolution whether intellectual or militant. The case is,
this was not clearly planted into the consciousness of the students; therefore,
at the event of graduation, they will be just a neutral piece that will expand
the corporations.
The banking
model of education has led students to just become mere recipients of knowledge
and thus is the fate mentioned previously, as Paolo Friere suggests “men and
women (should) develop their power to perceive critically the way they exist in
the world with which and in which they find themselves; they come to see the
world not a static reality but as a reality in the process of transformation”.
Thus, transformation is only possible if the people with raised critical
consciousness had come into the spotlight, who are open to their ideas for
change and drastically calls and makes happen a social phenomenon such as a
revolution that aims to change the present oppressive system. Sad to say,
Bonifacio and Rizal are just mere topics, not served as an inspiration, unlike
how the 1st 300 movie ended.
Media too is
one avenue wherein these students are immersed into, whether through the use of
the internet or the classic television and radio. Most of our youth is exposed into these but with an inch of
suspicion that this mode of communication owes its existence to big
corporations that funds its existence by being its avenue for product
propagation. Moreover, why would big corporations allow the proliferation of
subversive materials that will eventually guide the people to contradict their
rule? Then the youth are pacified by happy songs of commercial jingles and
“starstruck-dom” making them allured with these pain relievers. Every after the
news are the teleseryes that makes them forget the issues and usually in the
end of these news are about popular artists and updates in their love lives. People
really need a dosage of their kind of opium to make them numb of the oppressive
system, thus making them neutral and thriving in an unjust social structure. People
need a religion, whether it be media or the real “apathetic” religion that will
numb them, as Marx said “religion is the opium of the masses.” I say, opium and
after a certain dosage, I can just sing whole-dumbly Pink Floyd’s song
Comfortably Numb.
Culture
wise, within the family table, it is a rare thing that the average family
discusses about politics. As much I have sat with many gatherings, that kind of
talk is one of the most forbidden and unpopular discussions thereof. Once you
start the topic, then suddenly a moment of silence arrives to make your voice a
lasting fleeting echo and then somebody will just start of with another topic,
leaving your words just a call to have a momentary break. Culture wise,
socio-politico awareness and critical consciousness is neither an appetizer, a
main course or a desert. Therefore, in the respective homes of the youth, then,
there is a discouragement of such talk.
Much of what
I am saying has been about the present conditions that are proving very
effective in numbing the consciousness of the youth. Culture, Media and
Education has been proven a sedative, an escape from the real life. No wonder,
with a so sarcastically perfect environment such as this, the youth is led to
less of a participant of the world he is situated in. Unpoliticized,
non-critical, apathetic, such is the present condition of the youth. Watching
Les Miserables made me think of Gavroche being highly less or even absent
person in our society. Once the youth will graduate, they will be neither a
Marius, but a mere worker, could be a Spongebob which is an awful tragedy. The
youth has been properly immersed in a society which numbs them, which
disengages them from the social reality that needs their participation. Therefore,
I present to you the unpoliticized youth, apathetic and not promising which are
all well furnished by the perfect environment that moulded them. Apparently,
this talk is just about the problem. Good enough that we seen the disease, in
order to find a cure. Just like a snake bite, the anti-venom is in the venom.
The youth is the problem, but a right reconfiguration of them will lead to a
solution, that is, an environment that stimulates them, and make them socially active.
<3
ReplyDeleteI think the media now a days advertise individuality - like how to love yourself, how to be comfortable in your own skin. I rarely see commercials in TV promoting love for your country, unity as a nation. Comfortably Numb.
ReplyDelete