Skip to main content

Institutional Mire

 

I was told to not bite the hand that feeds me because I was giving raw data of actual students’ performance during the implementation of distance learning amidst the pandemic. I know that I must be considerate. Since the finals are not here yet, whatever grades that I gave were undeniably temporary because I was still hoping for those students to catch up. I mean no disrespect to the institution, but I would not lie to the system and pretend everything is fine. The problem is present, and it must be confronted. And the hand that feeds me is not the cash disbursing agent of the institution, rather it is those who are taxed. The institution simply reallocated the funds, but as to one feeding me, it is the people via tax. Thus, it is my duty to serve them well by maintaining honesty at all cost. I am at lost being a recipient of an outdated paternalistic pretentious adage of subservience.

I know that our students are experiencing a huge toll and burnout in this pandemic. This reflects the poor training of our students because they cannot take on the mounting reading tasks brought by the modular approach paired with the uncontrollable dread and difficulties of the situation. If they were adept to endure reading and in individual learning, modular approach is not that difficult. However, most of our students are simply promoted out of leniency or to escape the system’s meticulous and blame-inflicting stance towards failing students. One cannot simply expect strong independent learning and reading resilience among our "overly protected snowflake learners." And on another note, I have no qualms with students who are experiencing the pandemic’s setback.

More so, the blame is on the teacher for not exhausting all possible means. If by all possible means, be it pedagogical, then the teacher needs to at least attempt to do so. But if all possible means refers to misplaced considerations that are outside the context of pedagogy, then that is a different story. Since the pandemic is still at large, I know considerations are inevitable, and with all due respect, I gave mine accordingly. With raised scores due to consideration given of submitting and even answering the majority of the modules’ content, being strict to the actual performance’s content is set aside.

I only needed the students’ eagerness at the very least during this situation. When the pandemic will be over and face-to-face will commence, I will go back on full steam to teach. But as for now, I am also treading carefully and considerately with the learners I am facing right now. Be it bullshit to some cases as their online behavior is almost next to frequent nonsense while passively or actively ignoring my communication, I still have to delude myself that these students are stressed and are just simply doing other things to keep their sanity.

But the main points I want to stress that our students lack reading resilience and individual learning skills. Moreover, with the majority of being technologically adept at very least, they are just mere consumers of applications with even mindless usage of such. They still need to be taught how to navigate key areas that are vital to establishing proficiency of being a digital citizen. And lastly, I have strong feelings against outdated pretentious adage. My duty is to improve quality education in the country and not just to mindlessly promote half-baked citizenry that can wreck potential havoc. If the nation has bad citizenry who cannot think, fail to decide, refuse to collaborate, score poorly on international exams on Math and Science, and fail to uphold high morals, then there must be something wrong with the education sector wherewith I take responsibility. 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Article Review on Elinita Garcia's "Gabriel Marcel: Primary and Secondary Reflection"

Summary:             Gabriel Marcel is a known French existentialist. His co-Frenchman, Jean-Paul Sartre, distinguished existentialism into two which were coined as  atheistic  and  theistic  (Christian) wherein Sartre did mention Marcel as part of the latter in lecture on Existentialism a Humanism . Marcel is a Christian existentialist because he included the divine even amidst the infamous perception of existentialism as godless. Moreover, he is also known for his non-systematic philosophy where he pointed out that the philosophical discipline starts from where one is (referring to the particularity of the situation); therefore, it is not from metaphysical assumptions or already laid down theories.             Marcel’s thoughts talk about the importance and the necessity of reflection wherein he divides it into two as a) primary reflection and b) secondary reflection. Reflection for Marcel is “nothing other than attention, i.e. directed towards this sort of small break
Post a Comment
Read more

Fin?

  Last 2012, there were hearts on fire that both had their first shared flame in an unlikely place. I was thirsty for love coming from being dormant while she was searching for a redemption from a series of broken hearts. Both struggled to find their place. Both trying to live their lives free from the hideous chains of a dark home. I must admit that I fell for her beauty and add to that, her care. As we both clasped our hands, it was a committed long shot to have the perfect rest for our hearts. It was a bit strange to have an affair under the noses of all that is forbidden both profession and a line of faith. Nothing was wrong as long both were in the ecstasy of love – no malice, no foul play, no trespassing of wills. That moment was a perfect episode in a romantic film – one where young love sprang amidst treacherous circumstances. We lived through the happiness of newfound belongingness and the battle of keeping that alive. 4 years before the wedlock were filled with ups and do
Post a Comment
Read more

Bertrand Russell and the Sense of Sin

Introduction             Ethics is this study of what is good and what is bad and throughout the course of history it had also its shares of disputes and animosities. But beneath all of it is that ethics is a means in order to arrive at happiness or the good life. Because we have to act correspondingly or in a certain manner wherein we can get to attain harmony within ourselves especially regarding to our conscience or in harmony with others in order to keep relationships or ultimately to preserve one’s self or to attain such security whether externally and that is in relation with others or internally or personal satisfaction. Our actions are guided by principles of which we take actions correspondingly but the question lies what then are these principles and sometimes we go back to our way of understanding or our metaphysical assumptions wherein we garner from these in order to make way into how we conduct ourselves in our actions. In this paper then, I will explicate Bertrand
Post a Comment
Read more